Tag Archives: junk science

Yawn: yet another new sighting of the Shroud in medieval art (well, a ‘water stain’ anyway)

  Late addition (July 2019) Please forgive this postscript, correction, “prescript”,  correction, intrusion, added many years later – based on some 350 and more postings here and elsewhere. That’s including some 7 years of my hands-on investigation into image-forming techniques, … Continue reading

Posted in Shroud of Turin | Tagged , , ,

Stephen Jones BSc. Grad Dip.Ed persists in his mistaken belief that the Shroud image is a photograph. (Where’s the scientific evidence?)

  Late addition (July 2019) Please forgive this postscript, correction, “prescript”,  correction, intrusion, added many years later – based on some 350 and more postings here and elsewhere. That’s including some 7 years of my hands-on investigation into image-forming techniques, … Continue reading

Posted in Shroud of Turin | Tagged , , , | 27 Comments

The Turin Shroud: but for the pseudo science it would have been dismissed long ago as a medieval fake

  Late addition (July 2019) Please forgive this postscript, correction, “prescript”,  correction, intrusion, added many years later – based on some 350 and more postings here and elsewhere. That’s including some 7 years of my hands-on investigation into image-forming techniques, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Charring, fluorescence and image-forming mechanisms. Beware Shroudology’s junk science and flawed logic…

  Late addition (July 2019) Please forgive this postscript, correction, “prescript”,  correction, intrusion, added many years later – based on some 350 and more postings here and elsewhere. That’s including some 7 years of my hands-on investigation into image-forming techniques, … Continue reading

Posted in Shroud of Turin | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments