A flow chart summary of the “hot Templar/hot template”model of the Shroud of Turin

There’s been some misunderstanding about what I have been proposing these last 2 years, in the course of some 200 postings. That’s partly my fault – the underlying ideas have developed organically, with few summaries en route.  End of self-flagellation: here’s a flow chart, hurriedly constructed in MS Paint, that I hope will allow folk to see that I am not proposing that a Templar was removed at half-time from the stake while still medium rare, and pressed into linen, to be later returned for complete combustion.

Colin Berry, Feb 10, 2014

Colin Berry, Feb 10, 2014  (Click on diagram to ENLARGE)

No, the TS was produced as tribute, memento, relic, call it what you wish in what an imaginative person considered the most appropriate art form – pyrography – scorching a heated Christ-like  (commandeered bronze crucifix?) template of one of the victims (Jacques de Molay? Geoffroi de Charney?) into linen to produce a negative (light/dark reversed) image.

Who commissioned it? Maybe Geoffroi de Charny,  Lord of Lirey, instigator of the hugely neglected Lirey Pilgrim’s badge, it bearing his and his wife’s coat-of-arms, and considered  by genealogist Noel Currer-Briggs to have been the older De Charney’s nephew.

Credits to follow

Shroud of Turin, left (positive) versus modern artist’s impression of the burning at stake of Knight Templar Grand Master, Jacques de Molay, Paris, 1314

Should there be interest in this posting I may try adding some more words at a later date. But you know what they say about a picture (“worth a thousand words”). Let’s hope the same applies to flow charts.

Postscript: here is just one of the many curious features of the Lirey Pilgrim’s badge, on the “uninteresting” reverse side – a series of trellis patterns, interrupted by pattern-free strips:

xxx

Click on images to ENLARGE

See Mario Latenedresse’s explanation above image on left, i.e. that it is an attempt to show the herringbone weave of the Shroud. But the pattern shown is a trellis, and the front side of the badge DOES show the distinctive herringbone weave. So might the trellis pattern indicate something else, something quite different?

See my recent post ( not forgetting a much  earlier one from 2013) for an entirely different explanation. The trellis is a plan view of the grid/grill used for mass execution of Templars, Paris, 1314, by slow-roasting. Nothing ventured, nothing gained.

Advertisements

About Colin Berry

Retired science bod, previous research interests: phototherapy of neonatal jaundice, membrane influences on microsomal UDP-glucuronyltransferase, defective bilirubin and xenobiotic conjugation and hepatic excretion, dietary fibre and resistant starch.
This entry was posted in Shroud of Turin and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to A flow chart summary of the “hot Templar/hot template”model of the Shroud of Turin

  1. norman says:

    same hypothesis was proposed in new thriller, “The Linen God”. Great read.

    • colinsberry says:

      Sorry, haven’t read the book, and am not a great fan of novels, certainly not of the Dan Brown genre (which I found tedious and all too often predictable with those little puzzles imposed on the grand-daughter).

      I’ve looked at the reviews of Jim O’Shea’s “The Linen God” but they don’t give much away re storyline, so it’s difficult to know what to read into your “same hypothesis”.

      If it’s a Templar connection, then I’m aware that others got there before me, notably Knight and Lomas with their “Second Messiah”. But I did not see the image as Jacques de Molay, at least initially, but as Geoffroi de Charney, who occupies one of the boxes in my flow chart. That was through learning of the Lirey badge and its history (which can be written on the back of a postage stamp) and following the De Charny lineage back from nephew to almost-identically named uncle, assisted by the late genealogist Noel Currer-Briggs. Only then did I learn that de Charney and de Molay had been burned at the stake on the very same day in 1314. When it transpired that both had in fact been sadistically slow-roasted, bells started to ring, given the scorch-like nature of the TS image (see previous posting for the way in which numerous lines of evidence seemed to converge and reinforce each other).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s