Links to my immediate three-part response to Thibault Heimburger’s critique of the scorch hypothesis

 

Thibault’s critique (with an artistic touch or two…)

My response in three separate instalments;

Part 1    Link 

Part 2    Link

Part 3    Link 

Given that’s quite a slug of information and argument/rebuttal there. I guess some kind of summary is in order. I may decide to add one here in the next few days.

 

Advertisements

About Colin Berry

Retired science bod, previous research interests: phototherapy of neonatal jaundice, membrane influences on microsomal UDP-glucuronyltransferase, defective bilirubin and xenobiotic conjugation and hepatic excretion, dietary fibre and resistant starch.
This entry was posted in medieval forgery, Shroud of Turin and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Links to my immediate three-part response to Thibault Heimburger’s critique of the scorch hypothesis

  1. Pingback: Time maybe to re-think the received wisdom about the entire Shroud image being “highly superficial”? | The Turin Shroud: but for the pseudo-science it might have been dismissed long ago as a medieval fake

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s